From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 27 20: 3: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C9214A1A for ; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 20:03:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id UAA36381; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 20:01:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 20:01:56 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199912280401.UAA36381@apollo.backplane.com> To: Peter Wemm Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) References: <19991228031445.9393C1CA0@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :Matthew Dillon wrote: :[..] :> And, in anycase, I am not going to spend hours putting together a long :> involved patch when a simple short patch suffices. If you want to :> spend the time to come up with your own patch (that doesn't screw the :> pooch in regards to cluster performance!), then I'm all ears, otherwise :> this patch is what is going to go in for the 4.0 release. : :Please hold fire for a bit longer. I have (what I think is) a much cleaner :fix in mind. There is no urgency here, a couple of hours isn't going to :make the slightest difference to the big picture. : :On a side note, as the original author of the changes that lead to this, I :would have thought it would have been appropriate to ask ME directly first :before going public. : :Cheers, :-Peter Your fix looks pretty good, Peter. I'll run it in and test it. I only wish you had come up with it before Poul started going off the deep end. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message