From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 28 22:30:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6239D4; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@felyko.com) Received: from felyko.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a528::3:1337:ca7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F7F8FC0A; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4d00:85:8077:b284:3e1f:accb] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4d00:85:8077:b284:3e1f:accb]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by felyko.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1FF439828; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:30:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=felyko.com; s=mail; t=1351463457; bh=RYY108MdpK3TwN2pkk8H5yUfSc0sKubj8TBU/ecteuA=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=PC7qvFLvRQthH14w1U/0Yp1lBjS5uIcYGP+RRnWNEU9FbA1VLI7FArY3jnDzsqhKj DKIz+MeyrEzn7OD9gjMEfnl8FJ0+FarNdrQt0GB63ky3e42njcINsb5VWOvalw0rLL 0+392G2iC2m17N6icUItcloDW9Qgb8bmeKwAwJ7E= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r242266 - head/sys/netinet From: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: <508DB0C6.5050902@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:30:53 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3E1E3E49-CB09-474B-878E-45962C74685F@felyko.com> References: <201210281947.q9SJlku2085767@svn.freebsd.org> <4532DEB1-4EFE-4E4B-BE1F-A99FFC58DBA3@felyko.com> <508DA4B3.4080002@freebsd.org> <8CE1596C-A1E2-49BA-985D-D4D6C891C544@felyko.com> <508DB0C6.5050902@freebsd.org> To: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:30:58 -0000 On 28 Oct 2012, at 15:25, Andre Oppermann wrote: > That's always the case. Reality is that the majority of links these > days is very fast compared to twenty years ago. We can afford to be > a bit more aggressive here. Otherwise taking your point to the = extreme > would mean that IW can only ever be 1 MSS. Not really. My point was that raising the initial window to overcome = deficiencies somewhere else is the wrong approach. Regards, -- Rui Paulo