Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Nov 1999 23:26:32 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr (Manuel Bouyer)
Cc:        tlambert@primenet.com, ken@kdm.org, don@calis.blacksun.org, ticso@cicely.de, grog@lemis.com, bright@wintelcom.net, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Journaling
Message-ID:  <199911042326.QAA20534@usr07.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <19991102134152.A18969@antioche.lip6.fr> from "Manuel Bouyer" at Nov 2, 99 01:41:52 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > NetBSD currently supports 16.
> > 
> > Yes, it breaks backward compatability.
> 
> No, NetBSD supports 16 only on ports that started with 16.
> Other still are 8. There are discussions about how  to move to a higther
> number (not 16, but at last 64 or more) without breacking backward
> compatability ...

You can't cross mount media between OSs with the same byte ordering.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911042326.QAA20534>