From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 12:48:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D98106566C; Thu, 31 May 2012 12:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917AA8FC19; Thu, 31 May 2012 12:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so832541wgb.31 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 05:48:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=c64HlroLjC9ej9tejNXwfs18/F4pUGL7yUG0bYbPZxg=; b=DtHpkCYCmW2ON2KQCbyx9TWR0EGxXtNF60AAk1rjWll0CYkKhb0iZvIOoup+k3Ip7V wWdrKmfRMdqhGyiulwpj1pojxaytIk0edgRJxAYbFjddynO3UWBEtc1XSOSrSY3y3ogH jhHYDhWevJ2e/mlRiVL0suL26JdV3p8iQwwtjJMQjKGohDVSACoJ0vJGBLWBIdJX5sun HUfN+O/bTeZz3l/5QbRWHDT+qOROJCjDyPneRPFFbv0cFjPONZtpl7yL/I9/CaPKSwTG 0igiAdP22dMFNrYy82zqREXFn6VNzXHSfwkPNlQwoTvQk5D/GNu7TGogCu344CC0i9rH x5ww== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.215.221 with SMTP id e71mr13858817wep.132.1338468518619; Thu, 31 May 2012 05:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.146.131 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2012 05:48:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FC76515.10302@FreeBSD.org> References: <201205301124.52597.jhb@freebsd.org> <4FC76515.10302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 08:48:38 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ryan Stone To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd , Alexander Motin Subject: Re: ULE/sched issues on stable/9 - why isn't preemption occuring? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:48:40 -0000 On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > In this vein it might make sense to enable KTR and KTR_SCHED in GENERIC. KTR_SCHED comes with a performance hit. Besides, with the DTrace sched provider that I committed this month (and MFC'ed yesterday) you can collect schedgraph data with a D script.