From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 10 23:44:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA02427 for current-outgoing; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 23:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA02422 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 23:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA26618; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 10:43:44 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 10:43:43 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: Bruce Evans cc: nnd@itfs.nsk.su, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPP - why set CLOCAL for server ('-direct' mode) ? In-Reply-To: <199709110631.QAA29277@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Bruce Evans wrote: > Presumably it needs to monitor carrier even for direct mode. Isn't the I don't think so. It is upper level control function, f.e. /etc/rc.serial > only difference for direct mode that getty instead of ppp opens the port? ppp already don't set speed for direct port confirming my idea about upper level controlling. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/