From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 24 13:39:29 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id NAA12511 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 13:39:29 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA12505 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 13:39:27 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id NAA22166; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 13:35:51 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199501242135.NAA22166@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: disklabel (1.1.5.1), partitions To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 1995 13:35:47 -0800 (PST) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com, kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de In-Reply-To: <199501242018.UAA01237@isl.cf.ac.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Jan 24, 95 08:18:20 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 643 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > > >2117025 1819 cyl 15 heads 77 sec > > > > > Does anybody have anything remotely close to a good reason for not nuking > > the above printf in sd.c and always report a 32/64/X geometry ?? > > > > I dislike the idea. If you think the reported disk geometry is causing > support hassles then just don't report it, don't pretend the disk > reported something else instead even if that's what we use:-) Exactly, I didn't intend to print it, only to stick it in the default disklabel. -- Poul-Henning Kamp TRW Financial Systems, Inc. FreeBSD has, until now, not one single time had an undetected error. :-)