From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Thu Jan  5 10:43:28 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069CFC9E01B
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  5 Jan 2017 10:43:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C13168C
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Jan 2017 10:43:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1cP5W2-000JTX-Ss; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:43:26 +0100
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:43:26 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client
Message-ID: <20170105104326.GB2648@home.opsec.eu>
References: <c798f1e9-92f0-1d2a-32e4-46dad59f05d0@FreeBSD.org>
 <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:43:28 -0000

Hi!

[openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc]
> Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set 
> the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary 
> packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see 
> removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the 
> complexity.

The other question is: What's the use of SASL anyway ? I've seen it
for years in mailserver setups, etc, and it always caused trouble.

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         3 years to go !