From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 29 17:28:44 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC431065673
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 17:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from outL.internet-mail-service.net (outl.internet-mail-service.net
	[216.240.47.235])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8190F8FC17
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 17:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160])
	by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7160A24A0
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 10:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151C82D6015
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 10:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <483EE7D5.5050408@elischer.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 10:28:53 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: arch@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: all mutexes -> read-write locks?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:28:44 -0000

it has been mentioned several times that through the evolution of the
locking primitives it has come to be that mutexes and exclusively 
acquired reader-writer locks are almost the same in terms of  overhead
and that it might be a good move to define all mutexes to be
actually just that.

this would allow people to slowly go through the system, catching low
hanging fruit by converting some of the mutex operations to reader
acquisitions wherever a writer is not required, thus reducing general 
system contention.

Is there any thought on this?  Last I heard jhb had confirmed that it
was feasible..