From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 20:05:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F91216A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:05:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177943D48; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:05:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9332081; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:05:15 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7B02080; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:05:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D589733C22; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:05:14 +0100 (CET) To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:05:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:13:49 -0700 (MST)") Message-ID: <86ek2iao05.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, kmacy@fsmware.com, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:05:20 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" writes: > If things have really changed, then we should change the default and > remove the kludges. My main objection is the mismatch, not the actual > value. Did you remove the kludges in the mk files at netapp to remove > the -fno-strict-alias? Most of the kernel builds fine without -fno-strict-alias. Some parts do not, and the committer responsible for introducing those errors added the kluges you mention to avoid having to fix his code. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no