Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:18:17 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with two interfaces on the same subnet? Message-ID: <kfe116$j7f$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70A47C@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> References: <kfduar$qrh$1@ger.gmane.org> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70995D@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <kfdvck$6ak$1@ger.gmane.org> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F70A47C@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 12/02/2013 19:10, Eggert, Lars wrote: > Hi, > > On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:50, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> You can make this work with ipfw rules (and I guess also setfib, although I have not tried that.) >> >> The concept of FIBs looks clean and applicable but setfib works on newly >> started process, and I would need to do something like apply it to >> packets coming from an interface. > > Assuming your default route is via igb2, you can do something like this: > > ipfw add fwd <router upstream of igb3> ip4 from <local address of igb3> to not <subnet of igb2> out > > (From memory, no guarantees.) Ok, but both the clients and the server are on the same VLAN and use private, non-routable IP addresses so there is no "upstream router"...? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlEah2kACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSxHpACglErHyl42DNAiu5JuGue/6BEh OGgAn09a8XNGvB3dmH2v6KIhc2DMR2zp =DVT2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?kfe116$j7f$1>