From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 19 01:41:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8713E16A4CE for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 01:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av11-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (av11-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2BD43D5F for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 01:41:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from manlix@demonized.net) Received: by av11-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id E553F37EE3; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:41:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av11-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C9437E49; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:41:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fisk.demonized.net (h97n2fls33o834.telia.com [213.66.186.97]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485E037E53; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:41:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from beard.demonized.net (beard.demonized.net [172.22.1.2]) by fisk.demonized.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ACBE40AA; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:41:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:41:41 +0200 From: Johan Pettersson To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Message-Id: <20040419104141.629c050e.manlix@demonized.net> In-Reply-To: References: <1082303878.855.6.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> <20040418202011.GA1000@laptop.6bone.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org cc: andreas.kohn@gmx.net Subject: Re: Page fault in rt_newaddrmsg on gif0 destruction X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 08:41:46 -0000 On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:17:04 +0900 Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:20:12 +0200 > >>>>> Mark Santcroos said: > > marks> It appears nobody else is using INET6 on CURRENT, otherwise you > would see marks> more complaints. > > No, not a few people using it including me. I believe it was working > fine on not very latest current. It seems someone broke it. > I have had this problem on my server since I first installed 5.0-RELEASE on it. Running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p4 now and the problem is still there.