From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 24 22:00:57 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F32A637B405; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 22:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0EFC343FAF; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 22:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from brett@lariat.org)
Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org
	[63.229.157.2])	by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA24778;
	Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:00:47 -0600 (MDT)
X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system
	susceptible to Internet worms.
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030724225832.02bd6bc0@localhost>
X-Sender: brett@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:00:45 -0600
To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
In-Reply-To: <200307250250.h6P2oCV6025315@arch20m.dellroad.org>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030723233055.02ceaa30@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
cc: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>
cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NAT and PPTP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 05:00:57 -0000

At 08:50 PM 7/24/2003, Archie Cobbs wrote:
  
>I don't have time to do any real work.. however, the PPTP control
>layer can be used pretty much as is.. i.e., the files pptp_ctrl.[ch].
>It has a fairly clean API that any PPP daemon could use, and all they
>require is some kind of event support.

We wouldn't be doing it quite that way; we'd be using it just to
steer the call through PPP (which wouldn't know that it was PPTP;
it would just think the call was PPP with MPPE on the CCP layer).
So, the PPP implementation wouldn't need to know about PPTP call
control.

--Brett