Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 18:49:23 -0400 From: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Logitech G510s keyboard fail. Message-ID: <CACpH0MdgB9-ZTiJmSgTJYE67mFoargYJE8tihGRq7uu4DBv4XA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <27a9b9f1-27e3-8fd8-13e2-57ef45888342@selasky.org> References: <CACpH0Mc7GLk%2BggA3_A_8O_MX5fi%2B-YtFfp-1GUTkOum12Omahg@mail.gmail.com> <f83acf52-0fa2-cf50-afaa-9eb6b74a832c@selasky.org> <CAF6rxg==viV5MpsxnOVKE5-mcR2CJmkpRjZuGCYEjJXmXHHZ7w@mail.gmail.com> <ec4139de-6765-a476-e6d0-0f6e0c1f4724@selasky.org> <CACpH0MfZ=NJ%2B16m7SVQPrRLRvMcLpWP56x0TSdbBBJb6aqg6ag@mail.gmail.com> <4300eab5-dafb-bce6-5b58-24d347202e23@selasky.org> <CACpH0Mfg1quviqvTs39sZ1AobXJNfA04azGonc-R8zkwkd98og@mail.gmail.com> <d167a6fc-c31c-49a1-4e66-ba2623296d63@selasky.org> <83c6aa1c-59a2-f96a-6841-e8b37801a966@selasky.org> <CACpH0Md11kwYAvyC8%2BQtjn3S86A65o3dKtp6sXySuM-ghCJbNw@mail.gmail.com> <27a9b9f1-27e3-8fd8-13e2-57ef45888342@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The largest number it was "skipping" was 993 ... awfully close to 10 bits. was thinking that 16 bits (a short int) was a more appropriate size, was all? On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> wrote: > On 09/29/16 17:52, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > >> In this case, 10 bits (1024) would seem right. 16 bits would seem a good >> use of bits. If I were to develop a patch along the lines of 10 or 16 >> bits, is there a good chance it would be adopted? >> >> > It is the opposite. 1024 bits. One bit for every possible key press, so > that you can press multiple keys at the same time. > > --HPS > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACpH0MdgB9-ZTiJmSgTJYE67mFoargYJE8tihGRq7uu4DBv4XA>