Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:59:38 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Tom=E1=9A_Drbohlav?= <drb@karlov.mff.cuni.cz> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jason Hellenthal <jhell@DataIX.net> Subject: Re: ZFS monitoring Message-ID: <4E69B95A.9090906@karlov.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20110909043601.GA49649@icarus.home.lan> References: <DC6A2FB7-9324-4734-BAA9-4A0B314BD87D@sarenet.es> <4E688BE4.8040602@karlov.mff.cuni.cz> <20110909034855.GA70001@DataIX.net> <20110909043601.GA49649@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! Dne 9.9.2011 6:36, Jeremy Chadwick napsal(a): > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:48:55PM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:33:24AM +0200, Tom?? Drbohlav wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Dne 8.9.2011 11:27, Borja Marcos napsal(a): >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Some time ago I wrote a FreeBSD data collector for Orca (www.orcaware.com/orca). Seems it wasn't much of a success, but I use it all the time :) >>>> >>>> I would like to add some ZFS aware monitoring. Any suggestions for key statistics that would be useful to see in graphic form? Something like cache hits/misses, etc. >>> >>> we've got great experience with http://cuddletech.com/arc_summary/ (btw >>> adapted to Nagios), actually, we use some version with added l2 cache stats. >>> >>> Drb >>> >> >> You have considerable missed this then: >> >> >> https://jhell.googlecode.com/files/arc_summary.pl >> >> and the current repository version: >> >> http://bit.ly/arc_summary >> >> Which at this time are essentially the same. >> >> sysutils/zfs-stats is essentially a clone of an older version with >> slight modifications. > > I could have a field day fixing this perl script. Would you like me to > contact you off-list discussing all the problems with it? There are > many (at least 6 just from skimming). It would be at least inspiring if you can shout out your opinion, do not mind in list or by e-mail, as you like. > I would worry if this script was used by something like Nagios natively. I am not sure what you mean 'natively', about 60% of checks made by Nagios for us is written by me, but I do consider it native. Just to be more precise, we push it to RRD through Nagios to see hwo is our ZFS doing. T:D > Major eek. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E69B95A.9090906>