From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Nov 16 23:40:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA19965 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 23:40:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA19960 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 23:40:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA09775; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 23:40:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 23:40:35 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Peter Mutsaers cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: full file system: df and du disagree - why? In-Reply-To: <87vhxt0y30.fsf@muon.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 16 Nov 1997, Peter Mutsaers wrote: > Huh?!? Aren't you mixing up the link count that is kept for links in > the filesystem (i.e. hard links) and some other count that keeps track > of the number of processes that opened the file? I was under the impression they were the same thing. Maybe not :-/ Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major