From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 20:58:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4273E16A400 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 20:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E8B13C447 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 20:58:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E5D9E1142C; Sun, 13 May 2007 22:58:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:58:46 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: Florent Thoumie Message-ID: <20070513205846.GA36911@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Florent Thoumie , Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20070510212817.GA67897@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070513162917.GA31143@graf.pompo.net> <20070513194701.GA25807@graf.pompo.net> <4647786B.3040601@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4647786B.3040601@FreeBSD.org> X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 20:58:49 -0000 --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Dim 13 mai 07 =E0 22:43:23 +0200, Florent Thoumie =E9crivait=A0: > Any reason why PORTREVISION is part of DIST_SUBDIR? Cause it caused a > few breakages for no apparent real benefit. Using PKGNAME to define > DISTNAME or DISTFILES is also a bad thing IMO. Yes, I did that to chase some silent updates, but it should be removed. --=20 Th. Thomas. --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGR3wGc95pjMcUBaIRAn1oAKC/PCcojrPcLAyMM9/TEMq3zUwa+ACfd8Jm i+ByYSbFGJ03rVEwlM6WcDQ= =3I/q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--