From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Dec 8 11: 3:22 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 8 11:03:21 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from pike.osd.bsdi.com (pike.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CDC37B401 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from foo.osd.bsdi.com (root@foo.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.137]) by pike.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eB8J2B760003; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:02:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@foo.osd.bsdi.com) Received: (from jhb@localhost) by foo.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.0) id eB8J2DU75205; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:02:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3A3000F6.52E9B1D9@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 11:02:13 -0800 (PST) Organization: BSD, Inc. From: John Baldwin To: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: Getting Kernel Process Information Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Kirk McKusick Sender: jhb@foo.osd.bsdi.com Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > A good idea. > I would like to add that if we get our war and split > struct proc > into : > 1/ struct proc > 2/ schedulabel entity > 3/ Sleepable entity > 4/ (possibly a linking structure for the above) > then all this would have to change anyhow. It seems possible > that your change might insulate us from the pain of that > happenning. It will do this (insulation). > When is the information copied from the proc structure into the > kinfo_proc stucture? fill_eproc(). You can at that time decide what you need to stuff in each eproc structure. -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.Baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message