Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 18:21:21 -0500 From: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> To: Aaron Smith <aaron-fbsd@mutex.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: attempting to port a package with no makefile 'install' rule Message-ID: <20001104182121.A40398@peitho.fxp.org> In-Reply-To: <20001104151406.D78199@gelatinous.com>; from aaron-fbsd@mutex.org on Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 03:14:06PM -0800 References: <20001104151406.D78199@gelatinous.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 03:14:06PM -0800, Aaron Smith wrote: > hi, i'm trying to build a port for litestream and i have a stylistic > question about how to formulate my own 'install' rule since litestream's > makefile has none. > > do i use patchfiles to wedge an install rule into the makefile, or is there > a ports-sanctioned 'install' psuedo-target that i should override instead? > i read the porter's handbook and didn't find this addressed. help > appreciated. > See http://www.FreeBSD.org/porters-handbook/c190.html You probably want to create a do-install: target in the port's Makefile. -- Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001104182121.A40398>