From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Mar  9 19:42: 4 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971D337B400
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  9 Mar 2002 19:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from alane@localhost)
	by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2A3fgF16947
	for ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 22:41:42 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from alane)
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 22:41:42 -0500
From: Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net>
To: FreeBSD Ports List <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: gettext vs gettext-devel
Message-ID: <20020310034141.GA16921@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
X-message-flag: Magic 8-Ball says "Outlook not so good." I'll ask it about Exchange next.
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

A quick find+grep shows that ~150 ports require the devel/gettext
port, and ~65 require the gettext-devel port.

Considering that these two ports smash each others files, how compatible is
gettext-devel? Is it safe to just use this one? Or is there a problem here?

-- 
Alan Eldridge
"Dave's not here, man."

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message