Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:45:34 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11} update to 10.1.0
Message-ID: <20170123204534.GQ13006@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <a75ee95d-f760-bb8c-531b-183c52211e2d@FreeBSD.org>
References: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org> <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu> <a75ee95d-f760-bb8c-531b-183c52211e2d@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > I tried to built it on > > > > 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r307013:311651M > > > > (why does it say r307013:311651M, btw?) > > Because some of your source is r307013 and other parts of your src tree > has been updated to r31165. Ah, yes, that's it. Most of the tree is 311651M, and there are a few places (bin/hostname/hostname.c, etc/rc.d/sshd) where I have small patches. > > utilBacktrace.c:155:20: error: implicit declaration of function '_Unwind_GetCFA' > > is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > uintptr_t cfa = _Unwind_GetCFA(ctx); > > ^ > > utilBacktrace.c:357:4: error: implicit declaration of function > > '_Unwind_Backtrace' is invalid in C99 > > [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > _Unwind_Backtrace(UtilBacktraceFromPointerCallback, &data); > > ^ > > utilBacktrace.c:357:4: note: did you mean 'Util_Backtrace'? > > > > Any ideas ? > > > > No, that's odd. I built on r311854 and had no issue. Maybe you could see > if you see the same? Hmm, not easy. It will take some time. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170123204534.GQ13006>