From owner-freebsd-fs Wed Mar 21 12:37:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mail.cise.ufl.edu (coast.cise.ufl.edu [128.227.205.212]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E2E37B718 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:37:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfh@cise.ufl.edu) Received: from cise.ufl.edu (waterspout.cise.ufl.edu [128.227.205.52]) by mail.cise.ufl.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC9FD815 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:32:35 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: NFS ACLs? (was Re: First round review request, ACLs for UFS commit) In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Watson of "Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:12:22 EST." Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:32:35 -0500 From: "James F. Hranicky" Message-Id: <20010321203235.4AC9FD815@mail.cise.ufl.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Robert Watson wrote: > > Let me know if you have any additional questions. Are there plans for adding support for ACLs in the FreeBSD NFS implementation? Are there issues that need to be addressed to ensure interoperability with other OSs' implementations? If I could find any kind of spec for ACLs over NFS, this might be a fun project to tinker with in my "copious spare time" , but I've had a devil of a time finding any good docs...the POSIX drafts don't seem to mention NFS specifically, and I haven't found anything else since the last time I talked to you a few months back...perhaps I'm still not looking in the right place? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Jim Hranicky, Senior SysAdmin UF/CISE Department | | E314D CSE Building Phone (352) 392-1499 | | jfh@cise.ufl.edu http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~jfh | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Encryption: its use by criminals is far less - - frightening than its banishment by governments - - Vote for Privacy - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message