From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 2 02:44:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D7C16A403 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 02:44:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8E443D4C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 02:44:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k922iPJG050119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:44:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.7/Submit) id k922iPPT050118; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:44:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Anish Mistry Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:44:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200609271445.32223.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <200610011322.07089@aldan> <200610011552.52426.amistry@am-productions.biz> In-Reply-To: <200610011552.52426.amistry@am-productions.biz> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Video-editing on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:44:47 -0000 On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:52, Anish Mistry wrote: = > It is supposed to be Sony's HDV (16:9)... = Does avidemux have any better luck understanding the file? No, "unrecognized file detected". According to Wikipedia's article on HDV, Cinelerra is, supposedly, the best video-editing tool... I'm porting the program now... -mi P.S. Is it possible, that fwcontrol should've but failed to perform some kind of byte-swapping or something on the data?