From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 13 02:26:06 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A908516A4CE
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:26:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7016343D1D
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:26:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 41C1551485; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:26:05 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: stheg olloydson <stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20050213022605.GA24426@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20050213004204.GA91920@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20050213021055.69766.qmail@web53901.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050213021055.69766.qmail@web53901.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
cc: kris@obsecurity.org
Subject: Re: The only worthwhile logo-related comments so far....
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:26:06 -0000


--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 06:10:55PM -0800, stheg olloydson wrote:

> Core being Core will do what they think is best, and they have every
> right to. That's not my point. My point is the discussion took place in
> secret. What I am suggesting is that when certain discussions take
> place that they be publicly readable.

Again, FreeBSD has never worked that way, but if you think it should
then you should raise the suggestion with core.

Kris

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCDrq8Wry0BWjoQKURAnaGAKCpoRyJfc/nCXS28OV80zbzwHl74gCeKYpE
SLnO+rfsRDmuUCkQ8tb76f4=
=WXuN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--