From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 20:35:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B0B106566B; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com) Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (mail.intertainservices.com [69.77.177.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045138FC0C; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.10.200] (unknown [172.16.10.200]) by mail.intertainservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 726A056D91; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:29:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1346790578.1456.44.camel@mjakubik.localdomain> From: Mike Jakubik To: Olli Hauer Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:29:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <50431591.5040406@FreeBSD.org> References: <1346543324.15749@da3m0n8t3r.com> <50431591.5040406@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3 (3.4.3-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-intertainservices-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-intertainservices-MailScanner-ID: 726A056D91.AFF5D X-intertainservices-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-intertainservices-MailScanner-From: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Waitman Gobble , "apache@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:35:09 -0000 On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:15 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: > On 2012-09-02 01:48, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >>> > > OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected when i did > >> > the test... > >> > > >> > snip ... > >> > > >> > > >> > So it seems more and more the reported issue is a local one. > > > > I agree. So you *don't* need testing on my 9 machine, right? > > Right, > > Thanks for your support! > > -- > Regards, > olli Hello, This change seems to break an upgrade path on my system. # pkg_version -v|grep needs apache-worker-2.2.22_5 < needs updating (port has 2.2.22_7) Ok, lets update it. # portmaster apache-worker ===>>> Currently installed version: apache-worker-2.2.22_5 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/www/apache22 ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> does not build with CGI. Please de-select CGI and select CGID instead ===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again. Terminated Great, no more cgi, seems like cgid is the new cgi, OK, lets update the config. # cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 # make config Uncheck mod_cgi. Run portmaster again, same error message. # cd /usr/ports/www/apache22-worker-mpm # make config Hrm, mod_cgi is not even listed here. Lets trey to build this port. # make ===> apache22-worker-mpm-2.2.22_7 conflicts with installed package(s): apache-worker-2.2.22_5 They install files into the same place. You may want to stop build with Ctrl + C. Conflicts? It's the same port.... Thanks.