From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 4 16:17:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E969516A41F for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 16:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E771E43D7E for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 16:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EiwWy-00043V-0b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:16:04 +0100 Received: from r5k4.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.10.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:16:04 +0100 Received: from martinkov by r5k4.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:16:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:15:32 +0100 Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <000d01c608c0$631632a0$2401a8c0@XGISH> <20051203205605.75367bfe@loki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5k4.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051114 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20051203205605.75367bfe@loki> Sender: news Subject: Re: How often portupgrades? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 16:17:34 -0000 Joerg Pernfuss wrote: > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:29:41 +0100 > "Kiffin Gish" wrote: > > >>Just wondering what a good rule of thumb is in how often to run >>portupgrades. >> >>I figure that once a week should be sufficient, however each time it >>runs it can take up to a few hours to complete which seems like an >>unnecessary hassle to me. Once it even started rebuilding the >>complete gnome port which took a couple days! >> >>Is this worthwhile? What are the benefits? >> >>Thanks alot in advance. > > > Everybody has to figure out that one for himself, so, here is my > rule of thumb: > > Upgrade your ports only when you need to. > > If all installed ports work fine and a new version doesn't introduce > some functionality you simply need to have, why update? > Just for the sake of updateing? > > > Joerg you forgot to mention security issues. even if you don't like often updating, you should run portaudit regularly (once a day?) and make sure you update the ports with security advisories. martin