Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:16:04 +0200 From: Mel Flynn <rflynn@acsalaska.net> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de> Subject: Re: math/ess CONFLICTS with devel/noweb, help with CONFLICTS= needed Message-ID: <4FD3A0F4.50802@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4FD33B6A.7050206@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20120608204143.5a1d780a@dijkstra.cruwe.de> <4FD268B5.4050103@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120609132520.42b0af28@dijkstra.cruwe.de> <4FD33B6A.7050206@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9-6-2012 14:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/06/2012 12:25, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote: >> Thanks for your quick answer. Incidentally, I am at this moment also >> preparing a maintainer update for a new version of math/ess. Should I >> perpare two PRs, one for the CONFLICTS and one for the actual update or >> is it permissable to pack these two into one? > > It is best to put all the changes you want to make into one PR. That > will get it processed most efficiently. And if there's a PR for the conflict problem, then mention in your update PR that this update "closes PR xxxxxx". -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FD3A0F4.50802>