From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 6 20:20:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3926516A4CF for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:20:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2347143D60 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i76KKZS2051001 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:20:35 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i76KKZi5051000; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:20:35 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:20:35 GMT Message-Id: <200408062020.i76KKZi5051000@freefall.freebsd.org> To: emulation@FreeBSD.org From: "Georg-W. Koltermann" Subject: Re: kern/68079: linux ibm jdk 1.4.1 fails with: JVMLH050: Signal stack registration failed (errno=22) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Georg-W. Koltermann" List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 20:20:36 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/68079; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Georg-W. Koltermann" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/68079: linux ibm jdk 1.4.1 fails with: JVMLH050: Signal stack registration failed (errno=22) Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 22:19:41 +0200 Update: The IBM JRE can be made to work by setting IBM_NOLDT=1 in the environment. So the remaining problem is definitely a problem with our LDT usage, conflicting with Linux emulation. I assume the port could be fixed by installing a wrapper script which sets this. Or at least we could add a message to the port asking the user to do it. As a prereq we still have to apply the patch from this PR, to get around the first problem. So could someone with a commit bit please commit it? Tnx, Georg.