Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:14:33 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?G=E9czi?= Szabolcs <szabszi@goodwill.hu> To: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd ipsec vs. freeswan ipsex with x.509 Message-ID: <20040324131433.GA28793@goodwill.hu> In-Reply-To: <87fzc07bak.fsf@strauser.com> References: <20040322194152.GB538@goodwill.hu> <87wu5c7ey2.fsf@strauser.com> <20040322222948.GA5000@goodwill.hu> <87fzc07bak.fsf@strauser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:43:31PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2004-03-22T22:29:48Z, Géczi Szabolcs <szabszi@goodwill.hu> writes: > > > freeswan still works for me. and I won't upgrade linux kernel to 2.6 > > series. so I need solution for freeswan x509 and freebsd ipsec. is there > > any? > > Well, going to freeswan.org, going to the docs for the most recent release, > clicking "Interoperating", and clicking the link saying "FreeBSD" took me > to: > > http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-2.05/doc/interop.html#kame > > There are several FAQs and HOWTOs that would seem to answer your question. thx, another question; does bsd's ipsec have solution for nat traversal? -- Géczi Szabolcs GPG: http://www.goodwill.hu/~szabszi/szabszi.asc Fingerprint: B36C 150C C316 5A15 DB5F 183A 303B 5AEB 36C2 3162
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040324131433.GA28793>