From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 22 23:24:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476EF16A47E; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:24:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940B5463E7; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:24:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5MNTdQH033387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:29:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:24:01 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: John Baldwin Message-Id: <20060622192401.1f36c623.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200606221627.07495.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200606070333.k573XmRc067920@repoman.freebsd.org> <200606201516.39121.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060622170955.GY95135@elvis.mu.org> <200606221627.07495.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, alfred@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile README X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:24:12 -0000 On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:27:06 -0400 John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 22 June 2006 13:09, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * John Baldwin [060620 13:31] wrote: > > > On Tuesday 20 June 2006 14:53, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:43:00PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > > > Personally, I was debating on just removing most of the > > > > > world target with just a message: > > > > > > > > > > "The world target has been replaced with the buildworld target." > > > > > > > > No! > > > > > > > > 'make world' is still my normal building process. Why force > > > > "make buildworld && make installworld"?? > > > > > > > > I don't care how undocumented it is, or obfusacted > > > > 'HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD' is; but please leave them alone! > > > > > > > > thanks for your attention. > > > > > > You can already get that via 'make DESTDIR=/ world' you know. :) And > that's > > > shorter to type. > > > > I think I'm missing something. > > > > Is the only difference between "make world" and: > > > > "make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld" > > > > That make world has the order of installs flipped? > > No, make world doesn't include the kernel stuff at all, and the "supported" > order (read, if you do it different that's fine, just don't ask for help if > you break something :) is to do buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, > reboot into single user mode, installworld. Of course, you can just do make kernel after the build, it cuts off a step. But I wouldn't advise if you plan on keeping world elsewhere. :) -- Tom Rhodes