Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:07:30 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: Dominic Mitchell <dom@semantico.com>, Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com>, Bjoern Fischer <bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAM (was: Re: MAIL set by whom?) Message-ID: <20010122120729.B93660@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <3A6C7111.80E5663F@newsguy.com>; from dcs@newsguy.com on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 02:42:41AM %2B0900 References: <3A6A50F3.307C9E06@nisser.com> <20010121103324.A297@frolic.no-support.loc> <3A6B042E.659C716D@nisser.com> <20010122094647.A7853@semantico.com> <3A6C7111.80E5663F@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 02:42:41AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Ports shouldn't touch /etc.
>
> Does the existance of /etc/pam.conf precludes /usr/local/etc/pam.d from
> working?
Other way around. From the man page (the last sentence is even
underlined :-)
Alternatively, the configuration can be set by individual
configuration files located in the /etc/pam.d/ directory. The
presence of this directory will cause PAM to ignore /etc/pam.conf.
--
Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010122120729.B93660>