Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:24:57 +0300
From:      teo@gecadsoftware.com
To:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: postfix && Maildir
Message-ID:  <20010614122457.A8391@gecadsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106131155110.66796-100000@sasami.jurai.net>; from scanner@jurai.net on Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:58:08AM -0400
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106131904440.17281-100000@spice.eahd.or.ug> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106131155110.66796-100000@sasami.jurai.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi scanner!
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, scanner@jurai.net wrote:

> 
> > >And understand the negatives of using the Maildir format?
> > 
> > No. Could you please point me to some documentation on that?
> 
> Go look through the postfix mail list archives at www.postfix.org for
> Maildir. Basically what it boils down to is if you have very little mail
> Maildir is just as good as mail box format. But the more mail you have the
> suckier Maildir performs. It's *alot* easier to deal with one large file
> then a directory with tons of smaller files. Especially for searching. So
> basically if you never go above a handfull of mail it won't matter to
> much. But the more you throw at Maildir the worse it gets.

well, least it claims to be more reliable 
    http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#maildir-delivery
    
-- teodor

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010614122457.A8391>