From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jun 7 13:01:41 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA03573 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 13:01:41 -0700 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA03567 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 13:01:37 -0700 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA08491; Wed, 7 Jun 95 13:53:02 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9506071953.AA08491@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: 2.0.5-A: Very disheartening? To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 95 13:53:02 MDT Cc: davidg@Root.COM, maddox@CS.Berkeley.EDU, sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au, bugs@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199506070944.CAA01756@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 7, 95 02:44:14 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I do know for certain that any write to memory of data that is in the > Pentium I cache will cause it to invalidate the I cache line. It will, according to "The Undocumented PC". The Pentium is the only Intel processer for which this is true. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.