From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 19:33:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B171D2FE64B for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Nz8g1LkLz4L2q for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: M8Nj.QQVM1mCqClKcOdWiblLB..8tPjxV.lDfVKfeuUmBs21fYNVYLiJX.ZAWT0 VwvTsrKJMs6m3mPTgwma_Wx8OhwSK9nqaJWYrqj8WZDuYsUWNfFSSETy.8G79Kw0l7l9Ht2BT3Ae xJJVsP9Kn7pyy.tulep1yxg1NViwJu5DVzTgO9APJ.Y0nbOqjQvHKNDmB1Vi_S2xutQPkMfvOgJG FE7RHuv0qH7fey6SV.NRcDaRU4a8sQbz_K3KmeM66hvpsopcPz2.okcd3YfRxsQTxyVDOvviqfHP jXyijZZxplMtMWeqfY.lw2.XPBUEEbKhp1fZkyevvcQvfwopGGPmOFbzbYthEyTgkO7cmgao4KBK vxjddG0GsbijnpIfWx3wzBZ9rtndG5elRJImsqYkEViWWBD5kKfTwJu0pzygzlXJhWP00VIhmlHG 11JHkN2jo8vVorONIvi.0O1THG4gYXFj2ojkPqdzmdKVSY6YASaOGSdF98wcKGQLOv6iD.A3CqqM o0QyXaVdOhMiG3xDlFPhFOUPoGDPsHj2nIohh0Hij8p7yWxth51xk3ikdQPPqtVDXQcdAlnwiAtZ t4KVzEAb00GxkB5bDZdHCtAlzqUa6Z9mOLgu2idXbfky9mlZv62WggAHsWFAHkqQJWvci1gfOBua WkysgKLUuuQisUJUI0KcrkmSMGOE09Yv8HQ8m_oky1C3g0tlLn_bGCn5DBznRU.OKdtRQE4cK1v7 Xwe47edO1zY2IEHIicainrmqG.1IT2dHA7T0vDXXIHBfWr089iuJm3bm1R0WLFwnprLrNwdy1_7K KH8uZl6PFkYdKMqKQgIy2evpTQ5aLws6SMJrTFTBL2CalwP3Q27WGzv_eJIqQtyr3Xh15yecgHBB araun2L0AvxQE2xP5aLD3EsvAMoxRSjywlJCiP6kdlwWvQ1lT287Vf8J991nfTTmT8xZscWG8FpJ WLuouIQesHu.5D8k0SkWsPLH6gU7n57ODJq1DRSTYCvcXtDEjoPpvnG9DXUhXQv4BKhRu7bfTw2u sRbUSmTfCim8EOLjOHfrA568QX9h33C.JN7PQZwXBmJBRxATILOZ13gxi00Se9Tjc1i70PchfL_4 xJ1y1zrdCyC5UeyOLyhb92C69XyBEn2XAn7kYMCIIM.Nxdt187HKdO5QBaV7Y4Fi.OdNzNUUGZtz jX9J4RYQhshtuvlKNpz0RJAcZkHiB77ZV423WmuZCQvI74c.5y7VARiqQXwu_JeyW9R7he6kLfEb Jgj9.tGSTKpro4EF.9kfvECzR1w6idNLinEzF3P2qoqf2MMGH3hIZHODkR627g5yGfgkex_g7Fno 4zZaCRsdFjT77H4XDYL8f6.YfnIFGLgAMsQjQnfDMgqd1q1RQbSdTVYDB6OtT79MReeyliveCSYp sJp02.iW_iSf7L4ZM8feIEg-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:05 +0000 Received: by smtp402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID f7e03dceffbc8b98332c17e07b8fc56a; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:33:02 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> To: bob prohaska X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Nz8g1LkLz4L2q X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.16 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.901,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (2.64), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.24)[0.237,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[31.64.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[31.64.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:08 -0000 [Gack: devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and devel/py-pshinx18 by default.] On 2020-May-15, at 11:59, Mark Millard wrote: >=20 > On 2020-May-15, at 11:05, bob prohaska wrote: >=20 >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote: >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via = freebsd-ports wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from >>>>> prior session(s) of building and installing. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new >>>> ports tree. The only "prior sessions" would have been within >>>> the dependencies of x11/xorg. Is that resolvable by poudriere? >>>>=20 >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. >>>>> The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . >>>>> Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but >>>>> I'll not list the others. >>>>>=20 >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has >>>>> 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: >>>>>=20 >>>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx >>>>>=20 >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: >>>>>=20 >>>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 >>>>> ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because >>>>> of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> The conflict is real and limits what combinations >>>>> of ports you may have installed at the same time. >>>>=20 >>>> I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope >>>> it won't be required later.... >>>=20 >>> It seems that just devel/llvm80 is pulling sphinx18 when building >>> x11/xorg. >>>=20 >>> Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now. >>>=20 >>> I've opened a PR to track this issue: >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246487 >>>=20 >>=20 >> Wish I'd known it was only the DOCS option! Too late now, >> sphinx18 is deinstalled and llvm80 is building. >=20 > What? llvm80 requires textproc/py-sphinx18 (when > the options cause such), not textproc/py-sphinx . > Deleting textproc/py-sphinx18 and building > devel/llvm80 will try to rebuild/install > textproc/py-sphinx18 unless the options are > set to avoid needing textproc/py-sphinx18 . >=20 > To build devel/llvm80 it would be > textproc/py-sphinx that would be deinstalled first > so that textproc/py-sphinx18 could be built and > installed during the build. >=20 > After devel/llvm80 is installed, textproc/py-sphinx18 > would be uninstalled so that textproc/py-sphinx could > be built/installed when xorg is re-tried with llvm80 > already installed. I did not trace down other dependencies but now looking a little (leaving options at defaults): devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and devel/py-pshinx18 by default. (xorg need not bein involved: just building devel/llvm[16789]0 has the issue.) Thus the sequence for default options may need to be something like: *) Starting without textproc/py-sphinx18 installed A) build textproc/py-sphinx and devel/cmake and install devel/cmake ( py-sphinx can be via indirection through devel/cmake ) (cmake does not have a run-time dependency on textproc/py-sphinx as far as I can tell.) B) uninstall textproc/py-sphinx so that textproc/py-sphinx18 can be built and installed C) build textproc/py-shpyinx18 and devel/llvm80 and install devel/llvm80 ( py-sphinx18 can be via indirection through devel/llvm80 ) D) uninstall textproc/py-sphinx18 so that either textproc/py-sphinx* can be installed if needed E) build xorg. (Since I use devel/poudriere-develto build packages and then install just packages for things that I run, I do not have to do such explicit conflict management for build-time conflicts.) Of course, figuring out options to change the status of also may avoid having some of the dependencies and so avoid some conflicts. >> This is probably a dumb question, but is there some way >> to learn at the outset what conflicts need to be worked >> around? Something like a "make conflicts" target? Seemingly=20 >> it could be done by hand, but that promises to be tedious.=20 >=20 > Not that will tell you what combinations of > options lead to what combinations of required > build or run prerequisites: That could be > a lot of combinations to cover. It is also > dependent on poudriere-like-building vs. not > for build prerequisites having conflicts > involved or not. >=20 > If one is familiar enough to see potential > conflicts in lists of dependencies there are > the makefile targets: >=20 > run-depends-list, build-depends-list > Print a list of all the compile and run > dependencies, and dependencies of those > dependencies, by port directory. >=20 > all-depends-list Print a list of all dependencies for the = port. >=20 > pretty-print-run-depends-list, pretty-print-build-depends-list > Print a list of all the compile and run > dependencies, and dependencies of those > dependencies, by port name and version. >=20 > (but no "all" variant for pretty-print-* ?). > What is listed would depend on the options > specified. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)