Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:26:03 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/antivir-milter Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist ports/security/antivir-milter/files avq.sh patch-doc::MANUAL patch-etc::antivir.conf patch-init::rc.avmilter patch-script::avupdater Message-ID: <20050710202603.N26692@newtrinity.zeist.de> In-Reply-To: <20050710175056.GA44180@nagual.pp.ru>; from ache@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:50:56PM %2B0400 References: <200507101504.j6AF40uj086321@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050710175056.GA44180@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:50:56PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:04:00PM +0000, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > marius 2005-07-10 15:04:00 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository (src committer)
>
> Please remove this check
> ${OSVERSION} <= 600004
> It causes older 4.4 binary installed on -current.
>
That's on purpose as there are no FreeBSD 6 binaries, yet, i.e.
binaries that are linked against libc.so.6. It's also not possible
(ports-wise) to use the FreeBSD 5 binaries on -current as those are
linked against libc.so.5 and there's no compat5x port, yet. So
unless one wants to make the users take care of manually installing
a libc.so.5 there's no other choice as to use the FreeBSD 4 binaries
on -current.
AFAIKT the FreeBSD 4 binaries are also not older but built from the
same sources as the FreeBSD 5 ones, at least the version strings
are identical.
Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050710202603.N26692>