Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 09:26:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226731] Some port manual pages include version number in filename, breaking intuitive man use Message-ID: <bug-226731-7788-vjkWF69EbM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-226731-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-226731-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226731 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open Keywords| |needs-qa --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Baptiste Daroussin from comment #2) What are our thoughts on adding a ports sanity check for version-suffixed m= an pages? That would help to highlight issues during ports QA I don't think this bug will progress without someone dedicated to identifyi= ng all ports with this issue and opening separate bugs for them. The least we can do at a framework level, if that's possible, is to highlig= ht it if we can, and if it's something we agree should happen, ie: un-version-suffixed man pages --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226731-7788-vjkWF69EbM>