From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 2 07:58:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70469901 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 07:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 307E829C4 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 07:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V5AFs-0007EC-O8 for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:58:33 +0200 Received: from [81.21.138.17] (helo=ronaldradial.versatec.local) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1V5AFt-0005uV-5Q for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:58:33 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS: unsupported ZFS version 5000 (should be 28) References: Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:58:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 5a5bc696c05b24d66fef48d694aeed0652e57d03 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: - X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 2ecd0b53b7de9511489f92806276a3d7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 07:58:43 -0000 On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:48:03 +0200, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Ok, so I think I have a little more of an idea as to what happened. > > Apparently, when I did an "svn checkout" this evening, I grabbed > releng/9.1 rather than releng/8.4. Apparently, that make > buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld also upgraded the > zpool for me, or something...I'm not sure what happened, but I *am* > sure I didn't type "zpool upgrade" at any point. Is an automatic > zpool upgrade included in installkernel now? No, it isn't. > So now I've got base/releng/9.1 revision number 253878 installed on > that machine, which apparently does support the 5000 zpool version, > but seems to somehow not have a compatible boot loader. > > I'm feeling like "gpart bootcode" ought to fix this problem for me, > but I've tried several iterations of that without success. > > For now, I'm booted off the 9.2-BETA CD in single user mode, and then > mounted my zpool and zfs file systems, and then ran "sh /etc/rc" by > hand, which started (almost) everything up for me. My jails are > running, so my services are up, so I'm going to sleep on it. I don't > have some commands like "ps" and "top" right now in the root OS (/dev > seems to be wedged), but at least I can poke around and look at some > files and see what happened, and then maybe fix it. Maybe post the setup of your disks. So people can take a look if your commands are right or wrong. The output of 'gpart show' and 'gpart list' are a good starting point. Ronald.