From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar  6 13:25:34 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9E8EFB;
 Thu,  6 Mar 2014 13:25:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl
 [195.190.28.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD68D23A;
 Thu,  6 Mar 2014 13:25:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138])
 by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ronald-lists@klop.ws>)
 id 1WLYIl-00081R-NH; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:25:31 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Mark Felder" <feld@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: bsdtar POLA change in 10.0?
References: <53171DAE.5070203@li.ru>
 <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <op.xcaxml0kkndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local>
 <1394111704.25672.91302321.2D5C71E3@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:25:30 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-lists@klop.ws>
Message-ID: <op.xcax8s0okndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local>
In-Reply-To: <1394111704.25672.91302321.2D5C71E3@webmail.messagingengine.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32)
X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1
X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net
X-Spam-Level: /
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled
 version=3.3.1
X-Scan-Signature: e462de357cb394d64966911c06262bc8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:25:34 -0000

On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:15:04 +0100, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014, at 7:12, Ronald Klop wrote:
>> On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:00:22 +0100, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org>  
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, at 6:50, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
>> >> I wonder why
>> >>
>> >> bsdtar --one-file-system
>> >>
>> >> suddenly started to skip archiving of mount-points? And no mention of
>> >> such behaviour change either in UPDATING or errata :(
>> >>
>> >
>> >      --one-file-system
>> >              (c, r, and u modes) Do not cross mount points.
>> >
>> > Isn't that what it's supposed to do? Skip any mounted filesystems? Was
>> > it broken before? Or do I simply not understand the behavior you're
>> > seeing.
>>
>> The question is if the mountpoint (directory in the 'current'  
>> filesystem)
>> itself should be tarred. After untarring you can than make the same
>> mounts
>> again, for example.
>>
>
> So you're saying that if I have a disk mounted at /mnt/disk and my tar
> with --one-file-system includes /mnt, the empty directory /mnt/disk will
> not be in the tarball?

That is how I read the question of Marat N.Afanasyev.

Ronald.