From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 23:44:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C778106566C; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D4A8FC0A; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF84A813E5; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:44:36 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([211.166.10.233]) by mail.geekcn.org (mail.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bAuryiJGgcEl; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:44:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from delta.delphij.net (drawbridge.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E997CA6A994; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:44:27 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent: mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to: x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tsi58mnH3ZRevlL6cCOGHRdoBlUTeFOPhr1kyS3mVuhNLKACig6FKSfSI6ezKDBMz 5romoLGFW49hD0ibU1fDw== Message-ID: <4D911D59.3000403@delphij.net> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:44:25 -0700 From: Xin LI Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110317 Thunderbird/3.1.9 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <20110328194251.9F2FE1CC0C@ptavv.es.net> <4D90F43B.7050606@delphij.net> <4D90F63F.7000901@FreeBSD.org> <4D90FB97.1020208@delphij.net> <4D9119FB.6090604@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4D9119FB.6090604@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=3FCA37C1; url=http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, delphij@FreeBSD.ORG, umq@ueo.co.jp, d@delphij.net, Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Unable to configure dirmngr after openldap upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:44:52 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/28/11 16:30, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/28/2011 14:20, Xin LI wrote: >> On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote: >>>> On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>>>> Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25. >>>>> I'll >>>>> take a look at CHANGES and see if I can figure out what broke the >>>>> inclusion of fetch(3) support if I get a bit of time. >>>> >>>> It seems that libldif now referenced the fetch support, and ironically >>>> it seem be a bug but a feature :( >>>> >>>> I have decided to disable FETCH support from now on, since it's likely >>>> to bring more problems. >>>> >>>> (If you would prefer to fix the problem for this specific problem, I >>>> think adding a '-lfetch' would be sufficient; but, it seems to be >>>> undesirable to depend fetch(3) unconditionally for all programs that >>>> uses openldap). >> >>> I know next to nothing about how the openldap-client stuff works, so I'm >>> sorry if these questions are silly. :) The biggest question is, does >>> dirmngr compile after your change? The other question is that the only >>> reason I have openldap installed at all is so that gnupg can use it to >>> fetch keys from ldap keyservers. Will this still work when the FETCH >>> option is no longer present? >> >> hmm... how do I test fetching from an ldap keyserver? > > I'll save you the trouble. :) I got your latest update and tested both > scenarios myself, and the answer is that they both work. > > So now the question is, should the FETCH OPTION be removed altogether? I > imagine that a lot of users will be at least as confused as I, and word > is that PRs for other ports are already showing up. I think that's being used in some ldap utilities so it might broke some applications that makes use of that? I'll add a note in UPDATING to document this. Cheers, - -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNkR1YAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBqaoH/0fOftHLInATGWxi9/JxTrv2 K0/SViPM7z9QRhPs8bpb1OnsQQvD7gwp/siz6TRkGMmTQcRc41ezmHmmX3wyhC27 mWQ6dx2BXNHJDATBcwiqAvQnUlIv5BBLwWqHRqiVvPc1k4ecqzoWSVACPzWNL4c0 LwlOgnE0dXwShB8ML5/4EJhAAsrtaaOveEDGT+WL6CmeDZzh/bc5K1g3qYHcmeBb qUD/crMrE3CfZAOd6qYY6L4gMw1A2Ed30DrjtKiW/4F807zBnmKVmH+5+YheIe9p McsHlHpxNtbN49A6pXTsYOhLD8ZyJIm6O/Znm6a1UcOi2pXBC7FWVuzcot/LJ1I= =a5f5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----