Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:59:15 +1100
From:      Jerahmy Pocott <quakenet1@optusnet.com.au>
To:        Roger Olofsson <raggen@passagen.se>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Difficulties establishing VPN tunnel with IPNAT
Message-ID:  <F9EE8494-4DC3-4A84-8606-D8C75248A33F@optusnet.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <4749B54C.8000703@passagen.se>
References:  <7BB1A732-4F07-499E-A183-22776FEEEE90@optusnet.com.au>	<47482C2C.6010700@passagen.se>	<894E3C92-2C45-4FC2-8C56-D4B303F0349F@optusnet.com.au>	<4748A115.1010002@passagen.se>	<57A2907C-0660-458C-B254-3C893B4532CB@optusnet.com.au>	<47498012.9000201@passagen.se> <AADC85EE-9C53-459E-9E6E-F1A701BDC7D9@optusnet.com.au> <4749B54C.8000703@passagen.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 26/11/2007, at 4:47 AM, Roger Olofsson wrote:
> Hello Jerahmy,
>
> Some progress it seems? Why not set it to allow gre from VPN server  
> only? Ie pass in quick on fxp1 proto gre from <vpn server ip> to any?
>
> The way you ask your question, 'make it work without static ip or  
> allowing all traffic', isn't that contradictory?
>
> As for the frag part, I'd say that if gre needs frag, then you will  
> have to enable it.
>
> About the CVS, I seem to have misunderstood your question. I  
> assumed 10.0.0.2 wanted to recieve CVS inbound and not serve it  
> outbound, or am I mistaking again?
>
> /Roger

Yes, that is what I meant by 'static ip' I could allow all gre from  
the specific ip address
but I would prefer that gre traffic be allowed from a host only when  
an existing connection
has been opened to it..

10.0.0.2 is a CVS server.

It seems to me that natd works better with ipsec



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F9EE8494-4DC3-4A84-8606-D8C75248A33F>