From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Apr 12 14:27:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E424AD3A4C8; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66B8BC0; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id EF0225F74; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:27:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Bernard Spil Cc: Ben Woods , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold , ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r438307 - in head: . security/libressl References: <201704111901.v3BJ1Ykc091596@repo.freebsd.org> <3d3a826a-45d1-dff8-e913-8111e71e8b7a@mat.cc> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:29:18 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:27:43 -0000 Bernard Spil writes: >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/438307 >>> >>> Log: >>> security/libressl: Update to 2.5.3 [...] >>> I thought the normal practice was for the commit to also bump the >>> PORTREVISION for all ports that depend on the one that has changed, to >>> ensure users of portmaster and portupgrade automatically rebuild all >>> dependent ports? >> >> It is not always feasible to do so, libressl is not the default, and >> there are *many* ports that depends on it through USES=ssl. > > There are currently no ports that have a runtime dependency on LibreSSL. > Both security/acme-client as well as net/openntpd use statically > linked libtls. If you don't bump PORTREVISION of static library consumers how else package-only users would pick up fixes that are part of the update? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213691#c4