Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:11:35 +0100 From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-lists@klop.ws> To: "Russell Haley" <russ.haley@gmail.com>, "Matthias Apitz" <guru@unixarea.de> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "libssl.so.8" not found Message-ID: <op.x9mmhlg9kndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local> In-Reply-To: <20151214071840.GA3771@c720-r285885-amd64> References: <CABx9NuSU94xhp-JJPLVUR04jr5C8vAhEodtGmUQnUfuZvNzH5Q@mail.gmail.com> <20151214071840.GA3771@c720-r285885-amd64>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:18:40 +0100, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> = wrote: > El d=C3=ADa Sunday, December 13, 2015 a las 10:40:22PM -0800, Russell = Haley = > escribi=C3=B3: > >> Hi There, >> >> I am trying to bring up an Arm image off the FreeBSD website for my >> hummingboard. The problem seems to be when I run pkg the system insta= lls >> the latest version - 1.6.2, and then fails with: >> >> Shared object "libssl.so.8" not found, required by "pkg" >> >> I've seen this in NextBSD, and DesktopBSD and even on my previous arm= = >> image >> but I was able to get around the problem by creating links from = >> libssl.so.7 >> to libssl.so.8. > > I have had the same issue on r285885 with ports as well from July this= > year and pkg 1.5.5 ... I accidently updated pkg to 1.6.x which could n= ot > find libssl.so.8; I forced back to 1.5.5 with an older pkg-static and = = > now pkg > complains about it database, but still works: > > $ pkg info pkg > pkg: warning: database version 32 is newer than libpkg(3) version 31, = = > but still compatible > pkg-1.5.5 > > I don't know why pkg 1.6.2 was produced with this recent libssl.so.8; = it > should have been done more conservative, IMHO > > matthias > I had the same problem on my amd64 laptop. Your FreeBSD version is too = old. Upgrading the FreeBSD base will give you the new libssl version. = After that you can upgrade your packages. What version of FreeBSD is running on this hummingboard? I guess = 11-CURRENT. Probably ssl was upgraded in FreeBSD and the new packages ar= e = build on this newer version. In 10-STABLE this is kept backwards = compatible, but in 11-CURRENT you have to keep up yourself. Regards, Ronald.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.x9mmhlg9kndu52>