From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 5 22:46:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86C616A41F for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whizkid@eeoth.pair.com) Received: from eeoth.pair.com (eeoth.pair.com [209.68.1.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAB2043D53 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:45:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whizkid@eeoth.pair.com) Received: (qmail 26182 invoked by uid 3033); 5 Jan 2006 22:45:53 -0000 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:45:53 -0600 From: "G. Adam Stanislav" To: doc@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20060105224553.GA19524@eeoth.pair.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Fight-Back: http://www.EasyWebFilter.com X-OS: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE Cc: Subject: The FreeBSD Release Engineering article X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:46:01 -0000 In FreeBSD Release Engineering, section 3.4.1, it says: "The only changes that should be made to the disc1 directory are the addition of a tools directory, XFree86, ..." etc. Now, should it not rather say Xorg, etc? Come to think of it, should the title of 3.2 not say Building Xorg rather than Building XFree86? Last but not least, should the first sentence of 3.2 not start with Xorg is an important component, rather than XFree86 is an important component? I mean Xorg is the "official" version of X as of 5.3-RELEASE, isn't it. Adam