From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 19 17:28:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B358316A402 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0C713C44C for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EEB8BD22A; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:10:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNH9TfaqtutD; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:10:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610588BD219; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:10:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3JHAmxb021362; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:10:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:10:48 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Tyrael Message-ID: <20070419171048.GA21349@freebsd.org> References: <41a3236c0704140724v1e6e4254r20adb5e7cc7c214e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41a3236c0704140724v1e6e4254r20adb5e7cc7c214e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: prebind support status X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:28:30 -0000 On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:24:16PM +0300, Tyrael wrote: > Has anyone started working on porting 'prebind' from OpenBSD? > > Has there been any discussion over this matter; as to how much work this > would require ? > I would be interested into looking over this and see if i can implement it, > so any info any of you has would help a lot maybe if someone posted some interesting benchmark numbers people would care a little more ;)