From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 24 01:11:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBB316A41F for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:11:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DF743D80 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:11:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from echobase.hoth.dk (echobase.hoth.dk [80.62.210.27]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812265EE014; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:10:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by echobase.hoth.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2A08E19B3D; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:10:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:10:59 +0100 From: "Martin P. Hansen" To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20051224011059.GB28824@echobase.hoth.dk> Mail-Followup-To: Gary Kline , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051224004131.GA5905@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051224004131.GA5905@thought.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Scanner recs, please? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:11:27 -0000 On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Gary Kline wrote: > Before everyone cuts out for the weekend {or year-end}, > are there any models of scanner besides the Epson that > work with FBSD? (Or Linux?) I use a Canon LiDE 30 recognized as uscanner0: Canon CanoScan, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 3 in FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE (should also appear in 5.x) together with sane-backends-1.0.15 and xsane-0.96. Sometimes the sensorpanel get stucked, but it might be because it is old. And it seems it can't cope with the resolutions below 64 dpi. Otherwise it works fine. -- Martin P. Hansen