From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 12:19:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF8916A420 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:19:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01EF43D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:19:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [192.168.42.25] ([192.168.42.25]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0ECJ51k021730; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:19:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <43C8EC39.6080708@centtech.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:19:05 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander References: <375DD163B075E34EA3C10A6286E34A54C1D4B5@exhsto1.se.dataphone.com> <43C7A18D.8060904@centtech.com> <43C7B008.8060404@matrixhome.net> <20060113163525.nkluhr8fwg8k0oc0@netchild.homeip.net> <43C8A873.8000900@matrixhome.net> In-Reply-To: <43C8A873.8000900@matrixhome.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1241/Sat Jan 14 04:00:03 2006 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: FreeBSD as Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:19:11 -0000 Alexander wrote: > Alexander Leidinger пишет: > >> Alexander wrote: >> >>> http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz - there is comparation >>> of Linux FS. >> >> >> Since this doesn't cover the FreeBSD implementations of UFS or UFS2, >> this >> doesn't say anything about the reasons why you want to use a >> different FS on >> FreeBSD. > > So. Ext2/Ext3 is only modification of UFS and UFS is modification of > S5FS. That's why I don't think, that UFS or UFS2 work better than > ext2/ext3. But XFS and Reiser has big advantage. I think these are gross generalizations, and not very true at all. They are all different in their own right, and all have different performance charactoristics. If you feel ext3 would be better suited to your needs, feel free to complete the ext2 port to ext3 for FreeBSD, I'm sure lots of people would enjoy it. Better yet, finish the write portion of XFS. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------