From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Mar 23 12:58:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from bytor.rush.net (bytor.rush.net [209.45.245.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B974137C4DA for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:58:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lynch@bsdunix.net) Received: from localhost (lynch@localhost) by bytor.rush.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e2NKwP025512; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:58:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:58:25 -0500 (EST) From: Pat Lynch X-Sender: lynch@bytor.rush.net To: "G. Adam Stanislav" Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What's in a name? (was: The Merger, and what will its effects be on committers?) In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20000322222211.00b41100@mail85.pair.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org There already *is* a lunix, its C=64 Little Unix (Lunix) I know, I've run it on my c=64, scary huh? -Pat __ Pat Lynch lynch@rush.net lynch@bsdunix.net lynch@unix.sh lynch@blowfi.sh Systems Administrator Rush Networking On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, G. Adam Stanislav wrote: > At 19:02 22-03-2000 -0600, Jay Nelson wrote: > >So what's the big problem with the name? If there is an AIX, we could > >be called CIX, or, if we really wanted to get nasty, DIX (BIX is > >already taken -- we could even call it Lunix, since Solaris is taken;) > >but it would be the same code and a number of the same people. > > Hehe. The only problem with naming the OS Lunix is that it would make *us* > (Lunix users) Lunatix! :))) > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message