From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  2 16:19:39 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CE3B937B401; Wed,  2 Jul 2003 16:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from skynet.stack.nl (skynet.stack.nl [131.155.140.225])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F34A143F93; Wed,  2 Jul 2003 16:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dean@dragon.stack.nl)
Received: by skynet.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534)
	id 94B903E2F; Thu,  3 Jul 2003 01:20:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dragon.stack.nl (dragon.stack.nl
	[2001:610:1108:5011:207:e9ff:fe09:230])
	by skynet.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2E29B3E27; Thu,  3 Jul 2003 01:20:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dragon.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1600)
	id 76FEE5F187; Thu,  3 Jul 2003 01:19:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 01:19:33 +0200
From: Dean Strik <dean@stack.nl>
To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Message-ID: <20030702231933.GD17796@dragon.stack.nl>
References: <3F0316DE.3040301@tenebras.com>
	<20030702183838.GB4179@pit.databus.com> <3F0327FE.3030609@tenebras.com>
	<3F0331EE.6020707@mac.com> <3F0350C7.7010009@tenebras.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F0350C7.7010009@tenebras.com>
X-Editor: VIM Rulez! http://www.vim.org/
X-MUD: Outerspace - telnet://mud.stack.nl:3333
X-Really: Yes
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.5 required=5.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Performance improvement for NAT in IPFIREWALL
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 23:19:40 -0000

Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
> 
> >Many people are wrong, then.  NAT is not a security feature.
> 
> We simply disagree.

Puh-leaze. Not this discussion again. Can we stay on topic please?

-- 
Dean C. Strik             Eindhoven University of Technology
dean@stack.nl  |  dean@ipnet6.org  |  http://www.ipnet6.org/
"This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli