Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:16:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Randy Schultz <schulra@earlham.edu> To: Grant Peel <gpeel@thenetnow.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anti Spam Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.64.0704201248560.95224@tdream.lly.earlham.edu> In-Reply-To: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT> References: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Grant Peel spaketh thusly: -}Hi all, -} -}I am posting this question here because I know there are alot of ISPs using FreeBSD (including me) and am hoping to get feedback, either directly to me or to the list. -} -}We are wrestling (as I am sure many are), with spam. Up until now we have been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by. -} -}We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda. Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is Easyantispam. Does anyone out there have thought on either or both of these? Usability? Reliability? Total Cost of ownership? Integration issues? I have no experience with Easyantispam. At a previous company I implemented a Barracuda solution, 3 - 600's to be exact, after investigating numerous (Postini, Brightmail, Ironport just to name 3). I set them up in geographically dispersed areas, including different timezones, and had them clustered to look from the inside as 1 unit. They took a tremendous beating, frequently >1.5 million hits/day each. Note that a "hit" != an email passing through the box as many of the hits were quickly turned away via RBL's. I pounded on a demo model, again a 600, for 7 days, 2 or 3 of which I over-drove the box(sending it more than it could handle, allowing the extras to build up on the lab's source systems). I had nearly every check enabled, including multiple header and body regex matching, and saw a sustained throughput of IIRC ~56,000/hr, for an average email size of IIRC 5kB. In the 3 years that I was there with the boxen IIRC only 2 had hardware fails, neither of which impacted us due to the clustering(tho' response times for quarantine access increased significantly). I found their tech support to be easy to work with and very professional. If the first-level support didn't know the answer they quickly admitted it and just as quickly called in second-level support. A few times I actually got to their third-level support. ;> In any case, I never sat on hold more than a minute or two. I like their API. It was powerful, having the ability to muck with any system parameter. I preferred the API when dealing with various setting enmasse. I did not like their reporting capabilities. IMHO they had the worst of all we looked at. A fair amount of data was available but nearly all of it required further massaging by us to be useful. All of these thoughts were circa 2003/2004 so FWIW. -- Randy (schulra@earlham.edu) 765.983.1283 <*> Rain puts a hole in stone because of its constancy, not its force. - H. Joseph Gerber
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.64.0704201248560.95224>