From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 18:31:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903ED16A4CE for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:31:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AE543D62 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:31:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-246-51.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.246.51]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9EIVG8x023342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:31:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <416EC5F4.8000203@mac.com> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:31:16 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Nottebrock References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <20041014105927.GU718@empiric.icir.org> <200410141341.29774.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200410141341.29774.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pi.codefab.com cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:31:25 -0000 Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:59, Bruce M Simpson wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:41PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: >> [ ...well made userland point snipped... ] >> Unfortunately, due to the way ata and atapicam are implemented right now, >> this is unlikely to happen soon. > > Easy workaround: Put atapicam into GENERIC. I'm waiting for that to happen > ever since atapicam entered the tree. I'd strongly agree, unless there is a major downside to doing so. (Disclaimer: Having ATAPICAM in GENERIC would reduce my email support burden for the dvd+rw-tools port by a noticable fraction. :-) -- -Chuck