From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 14:42:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B901065672 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504718FC18 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k32so1240183rnd.12 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:42:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=V5Axr5Fp3u6cjoQNG76rYAdMHsi2UYZ9fffS99lXuGU=; b=wvxqtG/vzdQH3aSVJnwqRJvftgvbVXJCa2NhGgxJpkF35TsPatfMMi6fUY91+e8SS+ FbC19UwsbTlS4MHOeT9hL8HGAKKhgMjQDNrVmhWR3qu1HP5uKr9DejhlaqD4OBymnejN e/BtLJdqiFU1pqZNfgl37n4GDW1mQgZKFpJoc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e1EDzL3zNarrs4bSUH94s3qhfxCa/HgEHSn9moSVc+PCKzUDsjVAd4r2Ey9QYvpBfo 6Ew28ZeBfFFqE9GyXF+WKO5WEcu3j2zG+85GgtJTYbMfFD5Oq/S3X6Sc5cDdOWiJ6xme Fkx/o4dxC2QoZkVrwUq/s8PNfcEaMoSiVTPFM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.95.15 with SMTP id s15mr3029526ybb.245.1234190124092; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:35:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090209132108.GA27104@dchagin.static.corbina.ru> References: <20081221174939.GA33531@dchagin.dialup.corbina.ru> <747dc8f30902050220y7b1d726bj9f6f83afa843b520@mail.gmail.com> <20090206063550.GA2123@dchagin.static.corbina.ru> <1233919189.1866.13.camel@localhost> <20090206122354.GA5670@dchagin.static.corbina.ru> <1233923734.1866.33.camel@localhost> <20090208200541.GA59299@dchagin.static.corbina.ru> <747dc8f30902090501l58979723l8e0de51482131991@mail.gmail.com> <11167f520902090511i52adaa7dm9c44025578aecf2c@mail.gmail.com> <20090209132108.GA27104@dchagin.static.corbina.ru> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:35:24 -0200 Message-ID: <747dc8f30902090635u205e8f55x19cfa201bdfd7028@mail.gmail.com> From: Renato Botelho To: Chagin Dmitry Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] futexes, flash9 related X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:42:06 -0000 On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:11:36AM -0600, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: >> >> please, try http://lnxx64.googlecode.com/files/futexes_partial_II.patch >> >> first patch fail at i386... >> >> What is the syntax to apply this patch to -CURRENT, also can this >> patch be applied to i386 as well as amd64? >> >> Sam > > hi, yes, of course. I usually make only compile-test for the i386, > but this time tested on a workstation :) > > previous version of the patch did not work on i386. > > > ps. I suspect that flash9 have problems that can not be solved > in the emulator. can someone test flash_v10? Is there any patch available to install flash v10 + native ff3 + nspluginwrapper? -- Renato Botelho